The Repeat

TAM-PER.08 · The Persistent · The Approximate Mind

There is a moment at every gathering of my peers when someone says “our generation is the first to really understand.”

The blank after the word changes. Mental health. Power. Climate. Identity. The structure does not. We are the first to really understand, the previous generations were sleepwalking, and our clarity is the proof that something has finally shifted. I have said versions of this myself. I will probably say it again before I finish writing about why I should not.

I love my generation. The rest of this could read as a takedown. It is not one.

We talk in a particular way. The vocabulary is precise. We can name forms of harm that had no name a generation ago, and the naming is a real achievement, the kind that changes what can be done because it changes what can be said. We analyze power with a fluency our grandparents did not have access to. We are, on average, kinder about some things than the people who raised us. Gentler about difference. Quicker to believe someone’s account of their own pain.

We are also certain. The certainty is the part that gives us away.

Every generation in the record arrived with new language for old problems and mistook the new language for a new understanding of the problem. The Romantics had it. The modernists had it. The sixties had it, with a confidence that now reads as both beautiful and a little embarrassing, which is exactly how my generation’s confidence will read to whoever comes next. The vocabulary felt like vision. It usually was, partly. It was also the sound a generation makes when it is forming, separating from its parents by insisting it sees what they could not.

I hear it in the room and I am inside the room. Not standing above my peers, taking notes like a visiting researcher. Sitting in it, agreeing with most of it, feeling the pull of the certainty, and hearing underneath the conversation the same cadence my professors play back to us from movements a century gone. The content is genuinely new. Some of it is right in ways the old content was not. The structure underneath has not moved.

It is not a flaw. It is how a generation works. You cannot inherit the world without believing, at least for a while, that you understand it better than the people handing it over. The belief is what gives you the nerve to take it. A generation that arrived fully humble, fully aware it was repeating its parents, would not have the energy to change anything at all. The certainty is the fuel. It burns off later, around the time the next generation arrives certain that you got it wrong.

AI is folded into our version of it now. We are the first generation to grow up with this, we say, the first to really understand what it means, the first who will get the relationship right where the older people online keep getting it wrong, panicking or worshipping or refusing to learn the tools. Some of that is true. We do understand things about it that our parents find genuinely hard. And it is the same sentence. The first to really understand. The blank filled with a new noun.

Seeing the shape of the certainty does not kill the affection for it. The seeing and the loving are not in conflict. I can watch my generation do the generational thing and feel tender about it at the same time, the way you feel about someone you love doing something you have watched a hundred people do, because the doing is so human it stops being a fault and becomes a feature of the species you happen to belong to.

I wonder whether the people in the room with me will recognize this when they are older, or whether recognition is reserved for the ones who happen to study the pattern, and whether studying it is its own way of standing slightly apart from a generation while still belonging to it completely.

Someone is talking right now about how we are the first to really see. I am nodding. I mean it. I also hear the century behind the sentence. Both at once. That is the only honest way I have found to be in the room.

References

#

Mannheim, Karl. “The Problem of Generations.” Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge. Routledge, 1952.

Mead, Margaret. Culture and Commitment: A Study of the Generation Gap. Natural History Press, 1970.

Twenge, Jean M. Generations: The Real Differences Between Gen Z, Millennials, Gen X, Boomers, and Silents. Atria Books, 2023.

Ortega y Gasset, José. The Modern Theme. Translated by James Cleugh, Harper and Row, 1961.

Eyerman, Ron, and Bryan S. Turner. “Outline of a Theory of Generations.” European Journal of Social Theory, vol. 1, no. 1, 1998, pp. 91–106.

This is the eighth essay in The Persistent, a series by Yagn Adusumilli examining what AI cannot change about the species that built it. PER-09, The Adaptation, follows.